
I don't usually mention specific brands on this blog, but one noteworthy product deserves special mention: the Nikon D300.
I bought one just a few days ago to use as a back-up camera body. I didn't expect anything great, just normal Nikon dependability.
My family and friends went to a picnic yesterday, and I took the camera to photograph the kids. I wanted to see how well the camera dealt with skin tones using the on-camera flash. I don't ever use such flashes in studio, but for travel photography situations I often wished my pro camera body had a pop-up flash to capture fleeting, low light opportunities (Geisha in Kyoto come to mind). The D300 is amazing! I have no idea how they were able to do it, but the small pop-up flash creates fill light better than workhorses such as the D2Xs with a Nikon SB800 speedlight. I was very impressed with how well the camera judges exposure.
Usual problem areas with flash photography are blown-out foreheads, noses, and chins. This has always been a problem for editorial or event photographers, as they are almost always using a flash unit attached to the camera. Each flash photo that I took with the D300 was perfectly exposed; no bright foreheads or noses, and the background was always well balanced with the foreground subject matter. When I got home and checked all the images, my first thought was that (among many others), this was a great camera for travel, news, and event photographers. It is light-weight, fast, and exposes intelligently in full AUTO mode.
One of the secrets to creating such a well-balanced photograph is the optional Active D-Lighting. When this is enabled the camera underexposes the photo slightly, to avoid over-exposed highlights on a person's face. It then immediately overexposes the darker areas to create an evenly lit scene.
Some could argue that this is replicable in Photoshop. It is, to an extent. I found however that the D300 does a better job of boosting the shadow area than Photoshop's tools, such as the Shadow/Highlight slider. One could also say that the results of the D300's Active D-Lighting are the same as setting other cameras on Low Contrast. Not so . . . the D300's Active D-Lighting still maintains an acceptable amount of contrast, whereas the Low Contrast setting on other cameras yields a bland, washed-out photograph.
As I am only three days into the camera, I still have much to discover. At this point, at $1800 I believe that for digital SLR's, it is the best value for the dollar.
Mark can be hired as a photographer or filmmaker via www.hemmingshouse.com
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar